Stockholder Alert: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of the Innventure, Inc. Class Action
Shareholder rights law firm [url="]Robbins LLP[/url] informs investors that a class action was filed on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or othe

Innventure, Inc. identifies, funds, and operates companies with a focus on sustainable technology solutions acquired or licensed from multinational corporations. Innventure, Inc. ...
Plutux is not an investment adviser. Market data and AI-generated analysis are for information and education only, not investment advice. Disclaimer
Est. EPS $-0.16 · Revenue $892667.00 · 1 analysts
Est. EPS $-0.24 · Revenue $1.32M · 1 analysts
Est. EPS $-1.04 · Revenue $4.61M · 1 analysts
Est. EPS $-0.22 · Revenue $2.23M · 1 analysts
EPS $-0.51 · Revenue $534000.00
EPS $-1.60 · Revenue $476000.00
EPS $-3.10 · Revenue $224000.00
| Metric | Latest | YoYYoY means Year-over-Year. It compares the latest annual value with the previous annual value to show long-term trend strength. | QoQQoQ means Quarter-over-Quarter. It compares the latest quarter with the immediately previous quarter to show short-term momentum changes. |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueThe total money that came through the front door from selling things, before paying a single bill. Think of it as the grand total of every credit card swipe from customers. (YoY compares this year to last year's performance, while QoQ compares the current three months to the previous three). | $2.1M | +68.5% | -34.0% |
| Net IncomeThe absolute bottom line. If the company paid every single supplier, employee, banker, and tax collector, this is the actual money left in their pocket at the end of the day. | $-293.3M | -275.1% | -27.9% |
| Gross MarginThe basic markup. If they sell a $100 pair of sneakers, this percentage tells you how much of that price tag is profit right after paying for the rubber and shoelaces, but before paying for things like store rent or TV commercials. | -1910.5% | -604.4% | -63.7% |
| Operating MarginThe 'day job' efficiency score. Out of every dollar a customer spends, this shows how many cents the company keeps after making the product AND paying for all the everyday corporate overhead (like salaries, marketing, and keeping the lights on). | -5746.2% | +9.0% | -74.7% |
| Net MarginThe final take-home percentage. When you strip away every conceivable cost, tax, and interest payment, this is the exact number of cents the company truly gets to keep from every dollar in sales. | -14266.4% | -122.6% | -93.7% |
| Free Cash FlowThe holy grail of corporate cash. It's the spendable, physical money left over after the business pays for its daily operations AND buys the big, expensive upgrades (like new factories or servers) it needs to survive. This is the 'free' money they can use to pay dividends or buy back stock. | $-82.1M | -67.3% | +29.5% |
| FCF MarginThe ultimate cash conversion rate. It shows how good the company is at turning regular sales directly into cold, hard, spendable cash. A high percentage means the business is an absolute cash-printing machine. | -3993.2% | +0.7% | -6.8% |
| Debt / EquityThe financial risk gauge. It compares how much of the company's empire was built using borrowed money (loans) versus the owners' own money (shareholders). A high number means they are heavily leveraged and playing a riskier game; a low number means they are playing it safe. | 16.4% | +146.1% | -76.8% |
| Current RatioThe 12-month survival check. It simply compares the cash they have right now (plus things they can quickly turn into cash) against the immediate bills they absolutely must pay this year. A score above 1 means they have enough in the wallet to cover the upcoming bills without panicking. | 1.09x | +211.3% | -12.6% |
| Total AssetsThe absolute size of the company's empire. It bundles together absolutely everything of value they own—from the cash in the register and the inventory in the warehouse, to the software patents in the vault and the factories on the ground. | $599.2M | -33.8% | -2.8% |
| Metric | Annual (A vs E) | Annual Surprise | Quarter (A vs E) | Quarter Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS Surprise | -5.39 vs -5.25 | -2.8% | -0.32 vs -0.14 | -126.1% |
| Revenue Surprise | $2.1M vs $3.2M | -35.6% | $953000 vs $2.0M | -51.6% |
| Date | Executive | Title | Security | Side | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Brown Bruce | director | Common Stock | A | 30,000 | $1.51 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | Haskell Gregory W | director, officer: Chief Executive Officer | Common Stock | A | 50,000 | $1.51 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | Otworth Michael | director, officer: Executive Chairman | Common Stock | A | 231,000 | $1.51 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | Donnally James O | director | Common Stock | A | 225,000 | $1.50 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Brown Bruce | director | Common Stock | A | 7,083 | — |
Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to Innventure's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. If you have any objections, please disconnect at this time. I would now like to turn the call over to Kyle Nagarkar, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Kyle Nagarkar: Thank you, Mariana, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Innventure's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. With me today are Bill Haskelll, Chief Executive Officer; Dave Yablunosky, Chief Financial Officer; Dr. Bill Grieco, our incoming Chief Executive Officer; and John Hewitt, Chief Executive Officer of Accelsius. Earlier today, we issued a press release announcing our financial results, which is available on our Investor Relations website, along with the supplemental slide presentation. As referenced on Slide 6, we will be discussing non-GAAP financial measures during this call. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the differences between the GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are available on our earnings release and supplemental slide presentation on our website. In addition, certain statements being made today are forward-looking statements that are based on management's current assumptions, beliefs and expectations concerning future events impacting the company. These forward-looking statements involve a number of uncertainties and risks, including, but not limited to, those described in our earnings release Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2026, and other filings with the SEC. The actual results of operations and financial condition of the company could differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. With that, I'll turn the call over to Bill Haskell. Gregory Haskell: Thank you, Kyle. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us. We're going to run today's call a little differently by focusing the majority of our time on Accelsius. You'll hear from four executives today. Dave will take you through the financials, then I'll say a brief word about the leadership transition we announced in June, followed by Bill Grieco to share what to expect under his new leadership. And finally, John Hewitt, who took over as CEO of Accelsius in July, will walk you through where the business is headed and where the industry is headed with it. Let me give you the headline for Accelsius before we get into it. First, we believe the market is now debating when two-phase will be adopted, not if. Second, allocation of GPUs and memory, difficulties accessing power and two-phase enabled servers are impacting smaller early adopters. That has consequences for near-term revenue expectations, which Dave will address directly in his remarks. But here's the more important point. We believe those same forces have made the long-term picture for two-phase cooling better, not worse. John will walk you through exactly what changed and why. …
| Name | Title | Compensation | Gender | Year Born | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gregory William Haskell | Chief Executive Officer & Director | USD 994,000 | Male | 1958 | Active |
John S. Scott | Chief Strategy Officer | USD 680,336 | — | 1951 | Active |
David Yablunosky | Chief Financial Officer | USD 633,750 | Male | 1963 | Active |
Michael Otworth | Executive Chairman | USD 300,000 | Male | 1962 | Active |
William Grieco | CEO & Director of Refinity and Director of Accelsius | — | — | 1972 | Active |
Richard K. Brenner | Co-Founder | — | Male | 1954 | Active |
Neal Renuart | Senior Vice President of Accounting | — | Male | — | Active |
Chad Arnold | Vice President of Marketing | — | Male | — | Active |
Colin Scott | Senior Vice President of New Company Development | — | Male | — | Active |
Joshua Claman | Chief Executive Officer of Accelsius | — | Male | 1962 | Active |
Roland Austrup | Chief Growth Officer | — | Male | 1965 | Active |
Suzanne L. Niemeyer | General Counsel & Director | — | Female | 1971 | Active |
Heather Bickers | Vice President of Human Resources | — | Female | — | Active |
Shareholder rights law firm [url="]Robbins LLP[/url] informs investors that a class action was filed on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or othe

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $INV #INV--The complaint alleges that Innventure's DarkNX venture to build an AI data center campus in Ontario was a fabrication.

[url="]The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz[/url] announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Encourages Innventure, Inc. (INV) Shareholders To Inquire About Securities Fraud Class Action.

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP (“GPWR”), announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Labed v. Innventure, Inc. et al., Case No. 26-cv-07377, on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Innventure, Inc. (“Innventure” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: INV) securities between November 17, 2025 and August 13, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Plaint.
