Plutux
Haidilao’s delivery-and-multi-brand pivot turns margin defense into a discretionary-spending tell insight cover
Industry News7 min read

Haidilao’s delivery-and-multi-brand pivot turns margin defense into a discretionary-spending tell

In its latest interim update filed with Hong Kong exchange, Haidilao International Holding reported delivery revenue surging to RMB 2,051.4 million (+121.2%) and “other restaurant operations” rising to RMB 1,271.4 million (+113.1%). The implication for investors is sharper than the headline: if delivery mix plus multi-brand scale are holding steady profitability while same-store sales flatten, China consumers may be shifting spend back toward value-focused occasions rather than trading down to silence.

Published Aug 26, 2026Updated Aug 26, 2026

Delivery business revenue

RMB 2,051.4m

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026; +121.2% period-on-period

Delivery revenue share of group

9.2%

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026 vs 4.5% in the corresponding 2025 period

Other restaurant operations revenue

RMB 1,271.4m

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026; +113.1% period-on-period

Other restaurant operations share of group

5.7%

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026

Channel mix + portfolio expansion, not just new-store growth

Haidilao is reframing restaurant margins around delivery economics

What matters in China’s casual-dining cycle right now is not whether operators can open new restaurants—it’s whether they can protect margins when traffic is price-sensitive.

In its interim results for the six months ended June 30, 2026, Haidilao International Holding showed delivery moving from a minor contributor to a fast-growing revenue stream: delivery revenue surged to RMB 2,051.4 million (+121.2%). Delivery’s share of group revenue rose from 4.5% to 9.2%, which changes the way investors should think about “margin playbooks” under deflation-era conditions.

What the numbers say about the pivot

Delivery and “other restaurant operations” are growing faster than the core brand

Delivery business revenue

RMB 2,051.4m

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026; +121.2% period-on-period

Delivery revenue share of group

9.2%

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026 vs 4.5% in the corresponding 2025 period

Other restaurant operations revenue

RMB 1,271.4m

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026; +113.1% period-on-period

Other restaurant operations share of group

5.7%

Six months ended Jun 30, 2026

Haidilao mix shift: delivery and multi-brand growth are outpacing the base restaurant business
Line item6M ended Jun 30, 2026 revenueYoY / period changeShare of group revenue (6M ended Jun 30, 2026)
Delivery businessRMB 2,051.4m+121.2%9.2%
Other restaurant operationsRMB 1,271.4m+113.1%5.7%
The key signal is mix: delivery’s revenue share nearly doubled to 9.2%, which can stabilize operator earnings when dine-in traffic is uneven—even if ticket growth is harder to win.

Margins and the discretionary-spending debate

Flattening same-store sales alongside fast delivery growth points to a value-led “replacement” of trips

Delivery growth that happens while the core’s same-store sales are not expanding strongly is usually a sign of behavior change rather than broad traffic expansion.

In the same interim disclosure, Haidilao reported that same-store sales (self-operated Haidilao restaurants) were effectively flat: the document shows same store sales of RMB 16,348,861k for the six months ended June 30, 2026 versus RMB 16,571,065k in the prior comparable period, while average same-store table turnover stayed at 3.9 times/day. Put simply: delivery is scaling without needing the core brand to re-accelerate on dine-in demand.

Multi-brand scale: a distribution moat disguised as portfolio discipline

The multi-brand push matters because it spreads customer demand across formats

Haidilao’s second lever is not only “more delivery,” but “more ways to buy.” The interim filing describes a structured approach to replication within non-core formats.

It discloses 21 other catering brands with a total of 183 restaurants as of June 30, 2026. That is the scale background behind the “other restaurant operations” revenue line of RMB 1,271.4 million (+113.1%). From an investor lens, multi-brand restaurant revenue jumped in lockstep with delivery—suggesting demand is being re-routed, not just created.

Full supply-chain view: what changes for suppliers and downstream channels

Delivery-heavy growth changes ordering patterns across ingredients, packaging, and platform economics

  • Delivery mix increases reliance on standardized dish throughput, which tends to raise the importance of stable ingredient supply and kitchen-process consistency versus bespoke in-restaurant variability.
  • Multi-brand expansion diversifies SKUs while leveraging shared procurement, which can reduce per-unit input volatility if purchasing is centralized.
  • More orders flow through delivery platforms, making demand less dependent on local footfall but more sensitive to commission and promo intensity.
This is why “margin defense” in China restaurants is increasingly a channel-and-portfolio story: when dine-in is flat, operators must win the delivery storefront to keep volumes absorbing fixed costs.

Fundamentals check (listed proxy): where profitability sits

The pivot shows up in results, but the quality of margins still depends on delivery cost-to-serve

The interim filing provides net profit and core operating profit figures, which helps investors gauge whether the pivot is only “revenue optics” or whether it supports earnings quality.

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, Haidilao reported profit attributable to owners of RMB 1,766,871k (2025: RMB 1,758,525k). Core operating profit (non-IFRS) was RMB 2,513,490k (2025: RMB 2,408,104k). Even though the filing excerpt does not give a single summarized delivery gross margin percentage, the earnings direction is consistent with the idea that core operating profit rose while same-store sales were not expanding.

What to watch next (short-term vs. 1–3 year horizon)

The next catalyst is whether delivery growth slows—or becomes durable margin support

  • Near-term (days–quarters): watch whether Haidilao continues to grow delivery and other restaurant operations faster than the base brand, and whether core operating profit tracks that mix.
  • Near-term: monitor any guidance language tied to delivery cost-to-serve (promotions, platform commissions, and packaging), because that is the lever that can quickly erode “delivery-led margin defense.”
  • 1–3 years: evaluate whether the multi-brand replication model expands restaurant footprint without diluting unit economics—especially if delivery remains a larger share of the revenue mix.
  • 1–3 years: discretionary-spending implication—if same-store table turnover remains stable but conversion improves via delivery, it suggests customers are still choosing “occasion meals,” not eliminating them entirely.
The risk is that delivery growth can reverse quickly if platform economics tighten. If commissions or promo intensity rise faster than delivery revenue, margin protection can fade even with rising order counts.

Investor takeaway

Haidilao is turning a weak traffic environment into a channel-and-portfolio advantage

The market reaction to Haidilao’s interim update is understandable—but the actionable question is whether this is a one-period mix bounce or a durable new operating model.

Based on the filing, delivery’s share rising to 9.2% and other restaurant operations rising to 5.7% are concrete shifts in where revenue is coming from. Meanwhile, same-store sales are not booming in tandem. That combination supports a more nuanced thesis: China discretionary spending may be bottoming in the “value and convenience” lane even if dine-in demand stays restrained.

Listed market linkages to delivery-heavy restaurant economics

6Haidilao International Holding6862.HK--
--Vol --
-
Bullish
  • Improves mix-driven growth by pushing delivery to 9.2% of revenue, which should support earnings even if same-store sales stay flat in the near term.
  • Expands the growth surface via 21 other catering brands (183 restaurants), potentially reducing dependence on the core brand’s dine-in traffic.
  • Rises core operating profit to RMB 2,513.5m, but durability hinges on whether delivery cost-to-serve stays controlled.
3Meituan3690.HK--
--Vol --
-
Mixed
  • Stays a primary storefront for restaurant delivery demand, but competitive pricing can pressure platform contribution in weak discretionary periods.
  • Benefits if delivery share rises across operators, yet takes the hit if promotional intensity increases faster than order monetization.
  • Remains sensitive to consumer rebound timing, which will determine whether delivery volumes stabilize or surge then fade.
9Yum China9987.HK--
--Vol --
-
Watch
  • Gets indirect demand support if value-led occasions replace dine-in, but format-level delivery economics can differ by brand.
  • Faces margin volatility if promotions intensify to defend delivery orders, which can offset traffic gains.
  • Should show directional confirmation via comparable sales mix once next quarterly disclosures break out delivery/digital contribution.
0Tsingtao Brewery0168.HK--
--Vol --
-
Mixed
  • Can benefit if meal occasions shift toward “at-home” consumption, which can support packaged beverage throughput through delivery channels.
  • Is exposed if restaurants cut beverage attach rates during value-led promos, which can dilute per-check revenue.
  • Acts as a secondary signal for discretionary stability because beverage demand often responds faster than broader spending.

Plutux is not an investment adviser. Market data and AI-generated analysis are for information and education only, not investment advice. Disclaimer

© Plutux Technology Limited 2026