Plutux
Free tools

Company research

How much US large-cap revenue is foreign — and how few companies actually say

Everyone quotes a figure for how much of US large-cap revenue comes from abroad. Almost nobody says which companies it was computed over — and once you try, you find that a large minority disclose a geographic split too vague to use at all.

132 companies with a usable split · FY2025

FY2025

Foreign share, weighted
16.3%
over $6.2T of revenue
Foreign share, median company
21.0%
the middle company, not the index
Usable disclosure
132 of 375
35% of the universe
Unusable or absent
243
147 too vague · 96 none at all

Revenue earned outside the United States, revenue-weighted. Sectors where fewer than 5 companies disclose a usable split are left out of the chart and kept in the table below — a bar drawn from three companies is a fact about those three

  • Real Estate31.0%6 of 14
  • Communication Services25.2%7 of 14
  • Industrials23.1%22 of 55
  • Financial Services20.8%19 of 57
  • Technology18.7%21 of 80
  • Consumer Cyclical17.2%15 of 30
  • Healthcare17.2%26 of 45
  • Consumer Defensive7.8%6 of 20
  • Energy3.5%5 of 25
By sector, with the disclosure counts that every share on this page depends on.
SectorForeign, weightedForeign, medianCompaniesDisclose anythingUsable splitRevenue covered
Basic Materials68.6%13114$80B
Real Estate31.0%12.6%1496$71B
Communication Services25.2%4.3%14117$627B
Industrials23.1%25.1%554722$514B
Financial Services20.8%26.1%573219$544B
Technology18.7%13.0%807121$706B
Consumer Cyclical17.2%26.3%302415$674B
Healthcare17.2%27.1%453726$1,062B
Utilities11.4%2241$14B
Consumer Defensive7.8%6.3%20176$1,092B
Energy3.5%0.0%25165$847B
Over time. The company count moves with disclosure, so read it before reading the line.
Fiscal yearForeign, weightedForeign, medianCompanies
202517.0%21.0%128
202417.4%20.2%121
202317.6%22.0%119
202218.3%19.9%120
202118.9%21.4%121
202017.7%23.7%111
201917.5%22.8%109
201820.7%21.7%107
201718.2%26.2%113
201619.4%27.1%104
201519.0%34.9%99
Most foreign revenue, among companies with a usable split and at least $1B of revenue.
CompanyRevenue outside the USRevenueFiscal year
DHR Healthcare100.0%$15B2025
SYK Healthcare100.0%$6B2025
MAR Consumer Cyclical100.0%$6B2025
NOC Industrials100.0%$5B2025
FERG Industrials100.0%$1B2025
CCL Consumer Cyclical100.0%$8B2025
MTD Healthcare100.0%$1B2025
NEM Basic Materials99.6%$21B2025
MPWR Technology96.5%$3B2025
MCO Financial Services93.3%$7B2025
LRCX Technology92.5%$18B2025
BKNG Consumer Cyclical89.4%$24B2025
AMAT Technology89.2%$28B2025
WTW Financial Services76.6%$19B2025
LIN Basic Materials64.2%$34B2025
And the most domestic of the same group.
CompanyRevenue outside the USRevenueFiscal year
OKTA Technology0.0%$3B2025
RDDT Communication Services0.0%$2B2025
P Industrials0.0%$3B2025
BIIB Healthcare0.0%$6B2025
EME Industrials0.0%$17B2025
DXCM Healthcare0.0%$1B2025
TWLO Technology0.0%$5B2025
KMB Consumer Defensive0.0%$10B2025
EXPE Consumer Cyclical0.0%$9B2025
TTWO Technology0.0%$6B2025
CRWV Technology0.0%$5B2025
AZO Consumer Cyclical0.0%$19B2025
AXON Industrials0.0%$3B2025
XYZ Technology0.0%$24B2025
STT Financial Services0.0%$14B2025

Largest US-listed operating companies by market capitalisation, one line per company, foreign private issuers (ADRs and 20-F filers) excluded. Full provenance, method and a citation line are in Sources and method below. The universe and every filing behind them are listed in full.

The number everyone quotes, and the reason nobody should quote it precisely

Of the 375 companies in this universe, 132 publish a FY2025 geographic split that resolves into United States and not-United States. 147 publish one that does not — their segments are called "Americas" or "North America", which contain the US plus an undisclosed amount of Canada and Latin America — and 96 publish no geographic split at all. Every widely quoted figure for foreign revenue share is computed over some subset of this mess, almost always without saying which.

Over the companies that do resolve, 16.3% of revenue in FY2025 was earned outside the United States on a revenue-weighted basis, against a median company at 21.0%. Those two are far apart and both are correct: the biggest companies sell much more abroad than the typical one, so the weighted figure describes the index and the median describes a company.

The trend is the part to read most carefully. Between FY2015 and FY2025 the weighted share moved from 19.0% to 17.0%, a change of 2.0 points over 10 years — a drift, not the retreat from globalisation the commentary would suggest. Read the company count in each row before reading the line: disclosure changes from year to year, and a change in the sample looks exactly like a change in the world.

What this does not measure: where anything is made. A company that books every dollar of revenue in the United States can still buy every input abroad, and a tariff hits the second thing. This is a map of where customers are, which is the first question and not the whole one.

Questions people ask about this

Why can't every company be included?
Because there is no standard for the labels. Companies report segments called "United States", "Non-US", "EMEA", "Americas" or "International" as they see fit. "Americas" and "North America" cannot be split — they mix the US with an undisclosed amount of Canada and Latin America — so any company whose split depends on them is left out of the share calculation rather than guessed at. How many that is, is on the page.
Why is the revenue-weighted figure so different from the median?
Because size and foreign exposure go together. The largest companies in this universe sell far more of their output abroad than the typical one, so weighting by revenue produces a much higher number than taking the middle company. Quoting either alone is misleading; the page shows both and says which is which.
Does this measure exposure to tariffs or a weaker dollar?
It is where revenue is booked, which is a starting point and not the answer. It says nothing about where production happens, where costs sit, or how much is hedged — a company selling entirely in the US can still have every input priced abroad. Read it as a map of demand, not of risk.

Sources and method

Data
  • SEC filings (EDGAR)Each company's annual report on Form 10-K. Every company named on the page links to the filing its figures were read from.
  • Financial Modeling PrepDistributor of the filing data, and the source of the market caps used to pick the universe.
How it was calculated
Same universe as the other filing pages. Each company's own geographic revenue segmentation is read for each fiscal year and every segment label is classified as United States, non-United States, or unusable; a company counts towards the share only when less than 2% of its revenue lands in the third bucket. Labels such as "Americas" and "North America" are always unusable because they mix the US with other countries. The weighted share is total foreign revenue over total revenue of the qualifying companies; the median is the middle qualifying company. Counts of companies disclosing nothing, disclosing only unusable labels, and disclosing a clean split are published beside the shares.
How often it changes
Rebuilt from the filings about once a year, after the bulk of the universe has reported. The fiscal year it runs through is at the top of the page.
Citing this page

Free to quote — please link rather than copy the table.

Plutux. "How much US large-cap revenue is foreign — and how few companies actually say." Data through FY2025. https://plutux.ai/ko/resources/tools/foreign-revenue-exposure

Historical figures for information only — not investment advice, and not a forecast.

Plutux는 투자자문업자가 아닙니다. 시장 데이터와 AI가 생성한 분석은 정보 제공 및 교육 목적일 뿐 투자 자문이 아닙니다. 면책 조항

© Plutux Technology Limited 2026
Foreign Revenue Share of US Large Caps, by Sector | Plutux